H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 3-0

Gael Monfils holds a 3–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2011 Australian Open first round 6-7(5) 2-6 7-5 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gael Monfils #12 6-7(5) 2-6 7-5 6-2 6-1 Thiemo de Bakker #47 Match data Jan 19, 2011* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Gael Monfils #18 7-5 6-3 Thiemo de Bakker #46 Match data Aug 12, 2010* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Gael Monfils #13 6-3 6-2 Thiemo de Bakker #82 Match data Feb 12, 2010* R16 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gael Monfils #311 #6 3,815 2,169 577 362 61.4% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,754 0 1 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,782 0 1 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2008 30–17 63.8% #14 1,953 0 1 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 2,006 0 2 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,066 0 3 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 2,002 0 4 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,938 0 4 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,930 0 4 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,056 0 5 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,952 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2016 43–18 70.5% #7 2,067 0 6 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,970 0 6 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,919 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,925 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,937 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2021 19–17 52.8% #21 1,895 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,927 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,927 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2024 25–22 53.2% #55 1,904 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,773 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 5–9 35.7% #311 1,703 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gael Monfils Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2005 12 10 22 54.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2008 18 11 29 62.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 33 15 48 68.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 32 13 45 71.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 22 9 31 71.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2013 16 12 28 57.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 23 10 33 69.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 15 10 25 60.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 37 14 51 72.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2018 15 8 23 65.2% 10 10 20 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 30 13 43 69.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 15 3 18 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 13 6 19 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 17 14 31 54.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 14 9 23 60.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 389 217 606 64.2% 135 104 239 56.5% 47 37 84 56.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 917/940 of Gael Monfils's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gael Monfils Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 5/5 8.6 4.6 50.1% 73.2% 42.1% 59.4% 52.9% 57.7% 39.0% 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 2005 47/47 7.9 3.2 53.5% 72.4% 45.6% 53.3% 44.7% 60.2% 38.9% 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 2006 39/39 6.5 4.0 57.1% 69.6% 49.5% 51.5% 48.3% 60.9% 39.1% 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2007 42/42 11.3 3.8 56.8% 74.7% 51.9% 56.5% 41.4% 64.6% 35.1% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2008 43/47 7.3 3.2 61.0% 73.5% 48.9% 55.8% 43.6% 63.9% 37.6% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2009 60/61 9.2 2.3 62.4% 75.9% 50.2% 64.1% 44.6% 66.1% 37.7% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2010 61/61 9.3 3.7 63.1% 72.7% 51.7% 55.6% 42.5% 64.6% 38.0% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2011 53/54 7.8 3.6 63.9% 73.1% 50.9% 60.4% 42.6% 65.1% 38.9% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2012 28/28 7.1 4.3 64.4% 72.1% 47.2% 56.4% 48.2% 62.6% 39.0% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2013 55/55 7.7 3.7 66.0% 71.4% 48.6% 61.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.9% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2014 47/47 8.6 4.1 64.7% 74.7% 50.5% 56.6% 41.9% 66.2% 40.1% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2015 51/51 8.9 3.0 64.2% 73.5% 52.3% 70.1% 42.6% 65.9% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 56/61 8.2 2.9 64.2% 75.6% 53.1% 55.6% 50.1% 67.3% 40.4% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2017 34/34 9.1 4.0 62.8% 72.9% 50.7% 59.3% 42.7% 64.8% 38.9% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2018 48/50 7.8 4.4 66.5% 70.8% 49.9% 58.4% 48.9% 63.4% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 55/57 6.8 4.0 65.1% 72.1% 51.4% 62.8% 42.0% 64.6% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 21/21 6.3 3.7 67.2% 70.5% 49.2% 54.1% 44.1% 63.9% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 33/36 9.6 5.0 61.5% 75.8% 48.7% 58.1% 37.5% 65.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 21/21 7.4 3.5 60.5% 75.0% 51.7% 57.6% 43.1% 65.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 26/27 7.9 4.8 58.5% 75.2% 48.5% 64.3% 50.2% 64.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 45/47 9.0 4.2 60.2% 74.2% 51.2% 58.8% 38.3% 65.1% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 33/34 9.9 5.6 60.2% 75.5% 48.7% 58.2% 39.6% 64.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 14/15 8.3 4.8 58.4% 73.9% 44.0% 62.4% 36.9% 61.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 917/940 8.3 3.8 62.1% 73.4% 50.1% 58.8% 43.6% 64.4% 38.2% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gael Monfils Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1541 108.8 -0.58 +0.57 0.922 48.3% +29 — — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 0–1 — +0.16 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 2005 1755 136.3 -0.97 +1.08 0.975 49.4% -9 -156 -166 51.7% -0.20 8–7 (53%) 11–4 (73%) — -0.34 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 2006 1721 133.5 -0.81 +2.04 0.999 50.1% -49 -25 -128 51.0% +0.16 6–4 (60%) 9–11 (45%) — -0.10 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2007 1782 136.7 +1.42 -0.82 0.994 49.6% -153 +65 -178 54.1% +0.14 3–9 (25%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.33 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2008 1953 154.2 +0.73 +2.37 1.040 50.5% -67 -7 -277 60.3% +0.51 8–1 (89%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.32 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27
22 2009 2007 158.5 +2.40 +2.01 1.113 51.9% -18 -3 — 66.2% +0.91 11–6 (65%) 14–8 (64%) — +2.24 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54
23 2010 2066 159.3 +1.36 +1.81 1.073 51.1% +36 -91 -319 62.1% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 17–15 (53%) — +2.34 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2011 2002 157.4 +2.10 +1.95 1.116 51.8% +50 +13 -191 64.0% +0.69 10–6 (63%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.42 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74
25 2012 1939 150.3 +0.17 +1.43 1.041 50.6% +63 +20 — 60.9% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.02 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61
26 2013 1931 160.1 +0.59 +2.40 1.070 51.0% +14 +50 -85 59.3% +0.57 10–9 (53%) 13–13 (50%) — -2.90 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
27 2014 2056 169.1 +2.56 +3.83 1.185 52.6% +23 -15 -229 68.8% +0.98 5–8 (38%) 12–6 (67%) — -2.40 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71
28 2015 1952 158.7 +2.29 +1.91 1.117 51.9% +17 +137 -63 63.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 2067 172.6 +3.30 +4.82 1.234 53.6% +18 +2 — 70.7% +1.23 6–8 (43%) 13–9 (59%) — +4.14 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2017 1970 155.7 +1.37 +2.55 1.105 51.7% +56 +25 -100 60.2% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.21 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2018 1919 155.3 -0.44 +1.41 1.011 50.2% +63 +5 +33 60.0% +0.50 11–10 (52%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1926 160.8 +0.66 +3.33 1.112 52.2% +53 -1 -70 62.5% +0.96 16–6 (73%) 13–15 (46%) — +2.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1937 153.8 +0.85 +2.39 1.109 52.2% +115 -125 — 71.4% +1.27 1–1 5–1 (83%) — +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1896 147.8 +1.89 +1.74 1.115 51.6% +97 -123 -123 54.7% +0.32 4–8 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1927 151.1 +2.06 +2.54 1.144 52.4% +36 — — 72.3% +1.43 2–1 (67%) 6–0 (100%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1928 151.8 +0.57 +1.80 1.035 50.5% +27 -154 — 58.2% +0.30 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1904 154.2 +1.42 -0.11 1.005 50.2% +38 -180 -35 52.8% +0.20 9–9 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1773 144.0 +0.03 -0.16 1.006 50.2% +87 -34 +34 52.0% +0.23 10–7 (59%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 1704 129.7 -1.78 +1.13 0.996 50.3% +87 -17 — 45.0% -0.10 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2169 163.2 +1.14 +1.97 1.074 51.2% +25 -8 -117 60.4% +0.58 165–138 (54%) 232–176 (57%) 104.0 +0.51 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.