H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gastao Elias vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2017 Sydney International round of 16 6-7(5) 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #8 6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 Gastao Elias #81 Match data Jan 13, 2017* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Dominic Thiem #19 3-6 7-6(7) 6-3 Gastao Elias #142 Match data Feb 12, 2016* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gastao Elias Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 — — — — — — — 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 — — — — — — — 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 — — — — — — — 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gastao Elias Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 67/69 of Gastao Elias's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gastao Elias Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6% 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3% 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
Career — 67/69 3.8 2.9 51.8% 68.3% 49.5% 53.6% 42.1% 59.2% 36.5% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gastao Elias Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.0 -0.18 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.1 -0.37 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.