H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Guido Pella H2H: 1-0
Gastao Elias holds a 1–0 lead over Guido Pella in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gastao Elias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gastao Elias won the 2018 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-4 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Gastao Elias | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| May 25, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Gastao Elias | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Guido Pella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Guido Pella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |