H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Jozef Kovalik H2H: 0-1
Jozef Kovalik holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jozef Kovalik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jozef Kovalik won the 2017 Chennai third round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2018 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Jozef Kovalik | 6-2 6-2 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2017 | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2017* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jozef Kovalik | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Jozef Kovalik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |