H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1
Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Buenos Aires third round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |