H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gene Mayer vs Harold Solomon H2H: 1-3
Harold Solomon holds a 3–1 lead over Gene Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 2–0 on carpet, while Gene Mayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gene Mayer won the 1979 Houston third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1979* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gene Mayer | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1979* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Harold Solomon | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Harold Solomon | 6-4 6-2 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1978* | Dayton | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Harold Solomon | 6-4 6-3 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene Mayer | #976 | #4 | 6 | 2,198 | 311 | 159 | 66.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gene Mayer | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #142 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,979 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1980 | 71–16 | 81.6% | #5 | 2,139 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1981 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1982 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,069 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1983 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #10 | 1,964 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1984 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,863 | 0 | 14 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,841 | 0 | 14 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |