H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Gianluca Naso vs Thomas Schoorel.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Naso | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Thomas Schoorel | Match data | Sep 20, 2011* | Q3 | Tiriac Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Thomas Schoorel | 6-4 6-4 | Gianluca Naso | Match data | Jan 3, 2011 | Q1 | Qatar Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Naso | #1,655 | #175 | 346 | 1,625 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Schoorel | #1,916 | #94 | 549 | 1,693 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Naso | Thomas Schoorel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #232 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Gianluca Naso | Thomas Schoorel | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 47.9% | 66.1% | 41.0% | 68.4% | 25.0% | 53.0% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 51.5% | 64.1% | 36.7% | 33.3% | 50.0% | 49.6% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 7/7 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 55.7% | 68.2% | 44.7% | 55.5% | 22.6% | 57.8% | 35.0% | 2010 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 56.6% | 63.3% | 30.4% | 37.5% | 0.0% | 49.1% | 29.5% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5/5 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 65.4% | 67.3% | 47.6% | 68.3% | 6.0% | 60.4% | 27.7% |
| 24 | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 53.7% | 81.5% | 41.8% | 55.6% | 12.5% | 62.1% | 31.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 65.5% | 61.1% | 47.4% | 57.1% | 0.0% | 56.4% | 22.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 14/14 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 54.8% | 69.8% | 42.9% | 53.4% | 22.9% | 57.1% | 34.4% | — | 6/6 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 64.0% | 66.6% | 44.7% | 63.1% | 5.0% | 58.5% | 28.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Gianluca Naso | Thomas Schoorel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1481 | 97.1 | -2.26 | -5.38 | 0.769 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.25 | 2007 | 1486 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1493 | 100.0 | -1.48 | -1.77 | 0.831 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2008 | 1475 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 1494 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 1600 | 113.9 | -2.23 | -2.05 | 0.828 | 46.0% | — | +27 | — | 27.8% | -1.22 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.33 | 2010 | 1547 | 102.5 | -1.79 | +1.52 | 0.580 | 40.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1539 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1635 | 120.3 | +0.54 | -2.64 | 0.700 | 44.3% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.35 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1524 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1556 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1549 | 107.4 | -1.82 | -2.70 | 0.833 | 46.6% | — | +48 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | — | — | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1525 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1565 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 1518 | 104.2 | -1.03 | -3.85 | 0.514 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 2015 | 1575 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 1501 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 1489 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 1486 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1625 | 107.7 | -1.95 | -2.52 | 0.802 | 45.7% | — | +33 | — | 25.8% | -1.68 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.1 | +2.21 | — | 1693 | 112.7 | +0.15 | -1.95 | 0.676 | 43.6% | +6 | — | — | 21.4% | -2.14 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -7.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Paolo Lorenzi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 7, 2013 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 29, 2011 | H2H |
| Mate Delic | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 28, 2011 | H2H |
| Boris Pashanski | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 26, 2011 | H2H |
| Maximo Gonzalez | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Tobias Kamke | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 10, 2011 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 5, 2011 | H2H |