Gianluca Pozzi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Daniel Vacek holds a 4–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 64 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Jun 25, 1999* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Jun 12, 1999* | QF | Halle Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Daniel Vacek | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Oct 1, 1998* | R32 | Toulouse | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Daniel Vacek | 7-6(1) 7-6(4) 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Jun 24, 1998* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 173 | 258 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,821 | 171 | 220 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #43 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% |
| 24 | 1989 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 25 | 1990 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 26 | 1991 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1997 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 27 | 1992 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1998 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
| 28 | 1993 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1999 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 29 | 1994 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2000 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2001 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2002 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 105 | 149 | 254 | 41.3% | 6 | 34 | 40 | 15.0% | 32 | 36 | 68 | 47.1% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | — | 87 | 105 | 192 | 45.3% | 22 | 42 | 64 | 34.4% | 17 | 23 | 40 | 42.5% | 45 | 50 | 95 | 47.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1490 | 102.2 | -1.04 | -0.09 | 0.834 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.10 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1480 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1501 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | 1993 | 1560 | 126.4 | +2.79 | -4.51 | 0.922 | 49.1% | -2 | +9 | -4 | 41.1% | -0.61 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | +0.29 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1508 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.72 | 1994 | 1732 | 143.4 | +3.08 | -2.24 | 0.992 | 49.9% | -14 | -131 | -90 | 47.5% | -0.12 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–15 (46%) | — | -1.41 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1532 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +1.01 | 1995 | 1798 | 148.9 | +3.89 | -1.17 | 1.046 | 50.7% | +14 | -171 | -195 | 48.7% | +0.03 | 10–11 (48%) | 15–18 (45%) | — | -1.99 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1460 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 22.7% | -2.14 | 0–2 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.74 | 1996 | 1692 | 140.7 | +2.32 | -3.52 | 0.945 | 49.3% | +10 | -77 | -50 | 45.5% | -0.25 | 12–11 (52%) | 14–11 (56%) | — | -2.02 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1697 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | -143 | 52.8% | +0.04 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.02 | 1997 | 1670 | 134.8 | -0.60 | -1.91 | 0.906 | 48.1% | +38 | -50 | -60 | 41.8% | -0.61 | 6–7 (46%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -0.33 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1709 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -217 | -129 | 46.6% | -0.12 | 17–7 (71%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | +0.05 | 1998 | 1672 | 143.3 | +0.67 | -1.11 | 0.956 | 49.4% | +16 | -20 | -40 | 48.1% | -0.21 | 6–8 (43%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | +0.31 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1560 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | +12 | 35.1% | -1.37 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–4 (73%) | — | -1.02 | 1999 | 1741 | 133.9 | -1.09 | -1.27 | 0.909 | 48.6% | +1 | -191 | -65 | 46.2% | -0.17 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | +0.89 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1608 | 117.5 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | -94 | 40.5% | -0.71 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.46 | 2000 | 1629 | 122.6 | -4.37 | -4.38 | 0.659 | 42.4% | +53 | -125 | — | 27.5% | -2.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -1.16 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1555 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +2 | 35.1% | -1.13 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.52 | 2001 | 1595 | 122.1 | -0.70 | -2.81 | 0.721 | 45.3% | +49 | — | — | 23.8% | -1.67 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.96 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1531 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | +61 | 37.3% | -0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | 2002 | 1578 | 111.7 | +0.38 | -0.21 | 0.865 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.17 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.38 |
| 32 | 1997 | 1509 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.36 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1654 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -252 | -36 | 46.2% | -0.16 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 1602 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -205 | +16 | 41.8% | -0.45 | 6–11 (35%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 1725 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -313 | +22 | 50.8% | +0.11 | 12–8 (60%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | -1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1494 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -133 | +119 | 28.8% | -1.23 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2002 | 1486 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1784 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -227 | -13 | 41.5% | -0.58 | 69–75 (48%) | 67–61 (52%) | 104.3 | +0.87 | — | 1822 | 143.7 | +1.22 | -2.21 | 0.930 | 48.9% | +12 | -96 | -70 | 44.3% | -0.37 | 59–59 (50%) | 88–91 (49%) | 102.9 | -1.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 4 | 15 | 19 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 0 | 10 | 10 | Jan 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 13, 1997 | H2H |