H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs Mark Koevermans H2H: 0-2

Mark Koevermans holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Koevermans leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Koevermans won the 1991 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mark Koevermans
NED Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Koevermans #50 6-3 6-4 Gilad Bloom #76 Match data Feb 21, 1991* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Mark Koevermans #69 7-5 6-4 6-3 Gilad Bloom #77 Match data Jun 29, 1990* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mark Koevermans #753 #37 712 1,777 66 81 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom Mark Koevermans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #139 1,493 0 0
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 1989 12–11 52.2% #63 1,634 0 0
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 1990 26–19 57.8% #48 1,753 0 1
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 1991 16–25 39.0% #71 1,597 0 1
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 1992 12–20 37.5% #139 1,545 0 1
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 1993 0–5 0.0% #412 1,486 0 1
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom Mark Koevermans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1993 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% — 17 22 39 43.6% 41 44 85 48.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 12 17 29.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 68/80 of Gilad Bloom's and 68/78 of Mark Koevermans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilad Bloom Mark Koevermans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 39/41 3.0 2.0 53.9% 68.7% 44.7% 57.3% 41.1% 57.7% 39.6%
24 1991 34/39 2.1 2.3 62.5% 66.8% 48.2% 55.3% 43.3% 59.7% 38.2% 1992 24/32 3.5 1.7 55.8% 68.5% 49.8% 48.5% 39.0% 59.6% 37.8%
25 1992 24/29 2.3 3.0 64.5% 64.6% 49.2% 56.2% 42.2% 59.1% 38.2% 1993 5/5 3.0 2.2 58.2% 56.0% 43.9% 43.0% 36.6% 51.0% 33.8%
26 1993 5/6 2.0 3.4 66.2% 67.9% 46.4% 57.3% 53.1% 60.5% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 4/5 3.0 1.5 60.9% 62.6% 47.4% 46.3% 43.1% 56.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1/1 0.0 1.0 46.3% 60.0% 34.5% 50.0% 40.0% 46.3% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68/188 2.2 2.5 63.1% 65.8% 48.2% 55.1% 43.6% 59.1% 38.5% — 68/147 3.2 1.9 54.9% 67.7% 46.5% 53.1% 40.0% 57.8% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom Mark Koevermans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10 1988 1493 106.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
21 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23 1989 1634 132.7 — — — — +3 -82 — 50.0% +0.11 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.70
22 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89 1990 1754 136.3 — — — — -104 +4 -109 52.9% +0.28 13–5 (72%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.01
23 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07 1991 1597 132.1 -2.18 +0.19 0.936 48.7% -42 +156 — 43.1% -0.42 3–10 (23%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.74
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 1992 1546 118.8 -1.22 -1.57 0.936 48.5% -47 +137 — 40.0% -0.41 4–8 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +2.50
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91 1993 1486 101.6 -2.05 -3.43 0.689 42.8% — +104 — 15.4% -2.46 0–2 1–0 — +0.01
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 — 1777 133.6 -1.83 -0.70 0.915 48.2% -49 +84 -109 45.6% -0.19 22–27 (45%) 14–27 (34%) 93.3 +3.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.