H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Pedro Rebolledo H2H: 1-1
Gilad Bloom and Pedro Rebolledo are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1988 Kitzbuhel second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1988* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Gilad Bloom | 6-4 6-2 | Pedro Rebolledo | Match data |
| May 19, 1988* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pedro Rebolledo | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pedro Rebolledo | #608 | #36 | 335 | 1,801 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Pedro Rebolledo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #45 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #63 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #129 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #140 | 1,541 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #210 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #249 | 1,441 | 0 | 3 |