H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gilbert Schaller vs Carlos Costa H2H: 1-1
Gilbert Schaller and Carlos Costa are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Gilbert Schaller won the 1996 Umag fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1996* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gilbert Schaller | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
| May 29, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 7-6(7) 6-3 6-2 | Gilbert Schaller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert Schaller | #765 | #17 | 1,294 | 1,815 | 112 | 126 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilbert Schaller | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #48 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #20 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1996 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #97 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #302 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 |