H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gilles Muller vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-1
Gilles Muller and Lukas Lacko are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on clay, while Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2013 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 6-2 6-4 7-6(3) | Gilles Muller | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gilles Muller | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Muller | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |