H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gilles Muller vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 0-1
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2015 US Open first round 6-4 1-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Gilles Muller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Muller | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |