H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Gilles Simon vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Gilles Simon holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2016 Shanghai Masters third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-2 6-2 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gilles Simon | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |