H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 2-3

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–2 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2014 Paris Masters third round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2014* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #33 6-3 3-6 6-4 Gilles Simon #19 Match data
Nov 4, 2010* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard Gilles Simon #52 6-1 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #7 Match data
Jun 21, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Fernando Verdasco #21 6-3 2-6 6-3 Gilles Simon #29 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #34 6-0 6-4 6-3 Gilles Simon #41 Match data
Apr 15, 2006* Valencia ATP 250 SF Clay Gilles Simon #86 6-2 7-6(5) Fernando Verdasco #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7