H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 1-3

Ivo Karlovic holds a 3–1 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2015 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2015* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #21 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 Gilles Simon #11 Match data
Mar 15, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #239 6-3 6-3 Gilles Simon #31 Match data
Oct 18, 2008* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Gilles Simon #16 7-6(1) 4-6 7-6(2) Ivo Karlovic #21 Match data
Jun 22, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Ivo Karlovic #61 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 Gilles Simon #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8