H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 3-2

Gilles Simon holds a 3–2 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Gilles Simon leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2013 Bucharest fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 26, 2013* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Gilles Simon #16 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #39 Match data
Jul 22, 2011* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Gilles Simon #18 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #55 Match data
Jul 22, 2010* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #60 6-4 3-6 7-5 Gilles Simon #33 Match data
Feb 24, 2006* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #26 7-6(1) 6-1 Gilles Simon #81 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Gilles Simon #80 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 — — — — — — —
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 — — — — — — —