H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gilles Simon vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 5-10
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 10–5 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 10–2 on hard courts, while Gilles Simon leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2022 Marseille third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
10
15 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Simon | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| 37 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |