H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-2

Lukas Rosol holds a 2–1 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–0 on clay, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2014 Tiriac Open quarterfinal 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #43 7-6(2) 6-2 Gilles Simon #28 Match data Apr 26, 2014* QF Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Lukas Rosol #48 6-2 6-3 Gilles Simon #16 Match data Apr 27, 2013* SF Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Gilles Simon #33 6-2 6-3 Lukas Rosol #155 Match data Feb 24, 2011* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Simon Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 866/882 of Gilles Simon's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Simon Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2% 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0% 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
35 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9% 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
37 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Simon Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.30 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.35 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.42 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) — +4.99 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) — +0.18 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) — +3.21 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) — +1.94 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.84 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.25 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.19 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.50 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) — +0.92 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +2.17 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.39 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.48 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.44 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.