H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-3

Gilles Simon and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2016 Madrid Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 3, 2016* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Gilles Simon #18 6-3 3-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #38 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #36 6-3 6-4 Gilles Simon #16 Match data
Oct 31, 2012* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Gilles Simon #20 7-5 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #32 Match data
Feb 24, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #37 7-6(3) 6-4 Gilles Simon #18 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #18 6-3 6-3 Gilles Simon #52 Match data
Feb 18, 2007* Marseille ATP 250 F Hard Gilles Simon #58 6-4 7-6(3) Marcos Baghdatis #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14