H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gilles Simon vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 4-8
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 8–4 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 6–2 on hard courts, while Gilles Simon leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2015 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
8
12 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2015* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-4 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2015* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| May 15, 2013* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Gilles Simon | 7-5 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2011* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Gilles Simon | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2011* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-3 7-5 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2011* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2010* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2009* | Valencia | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2009* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2009* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-5 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 4-6 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Simon | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |