H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Nicolas Massu H2H: 1-0

Gilles Simon holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2006 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(6) 6-2 3-6 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilles Simon #123 7-6(6) 6-2 3-6 4-6 6-3 Nicolas Massu #61 Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 0 1 13 14
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 226 219 50.8% 0 1 0 0 1 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Nicolas Massu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2000 24–22 52.2% #87 1,648 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,629 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1
23 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,860 0 3
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6 2004 36–27 57.1% #19 1,796 0 5
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,633 0 5
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,727 0 6
27 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,618 0 6
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11 2008 7–12 36.8% #77 1,598 0 6
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,595 0 6
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,559 0 6
31 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,552 0 6
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 6
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 6
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14 — — — — — — —
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Simon Nicolas Massu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2000 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 13 14 27 48.1% 6 12 18 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 12 11 23 52.2% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 9 7 16 56.3% 24 10 34 70.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — 74 90 164 45.1% 139 108 247 56.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 866/882 of Gilles Simon's and 396/444 of Nicolas Massu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Simon Nicolas Massu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 3.5 3.0 62.9% 67.9% 37.4% 52.8% 6.3% 56.4% 30.9%
19 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6% 2000 36/46 4.4 3.1 54.6% 71.1% 50.7% 57.5% 39.3% 61.5% 35.8%
21 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0% 2001 43/48 5.4 2.5 55.0% 68.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.2% 59.1% 34.0%
22 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4% 2002 33/46 4.7 3.2 57.9% 71.2% 52.7% 61.0% 45.3% 63.3% 42.1%
23 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4% 2003 49/55 4.2 3.1 60.2% 69.8% 50.7% 53.7% 49.4% 62.1% 42.0%
24 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4% 2004 57/63 4.1 2.5 58.7% 72.0% 52.1% 63.5% 41.7% 63.5% 40.9%
25 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8% 2005 36/37 4.7 3.6 56.1% 70.3% 47.3% 62.5% 34.6% 60.0% 34.6%
26 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9% 2006 60/60 4.8 2.6 59.0% 71.1% 53.4% 58.3% 45.4% 63.7% 37.8%
27 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5% 2007 32/37 3.9 2.9 60.6% 66.3% 49.3% 58.7% 38.9% 59.6% 34.8%
28 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1% 2008 17/19 3.7 3.1 60.1% 68.6% 48.6% 50.5% 34.1% 60.5% 37.0%
29 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0% 2009 18/18 4.1 4.1 60.6% 64.1% 47.1% 59.5% 53.5% 57.4% 36.3%
30 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9% 2010 10/10 3.5 4.0 63.4% 66.9% 46.6% 65.6% 50.2% 59.1% 36.4%
31 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1% 2011 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.8% 60.0% 50.0% 66.7% 28.6% 56.4% 37.3%
32 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9% 2012 1/1 3.0 4.0 64.3% 55.6% 25.0% 58.3% — 44.6% 21.6%
33 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2% 2013 1/1 2.0 10.0 62.6% 62.3% 50.0% 71.4% 33.3% 57.7% 35.6%
34 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6% — 396/445 4.4 3.0 58.3% 69.7% 50.3% 58.7% 42.6% 61.4% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Simon Nicolas Massu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1489 102.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1471 102.0 -0.63 -3.54 0.709 44.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
19 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.22 2000 1649 128.9 -0.30 -1.80 0.930 49.0% -54 +24 -100 51.5% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.82
21 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.30 2001 1629 130.4 -2.10 -2.58 0.831 46.8% +22 -58 -46 45.1% -0.53 11–9 (55%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.30
22 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.35 2002 1752 141.7 +1.09 +3.69 1.148 52.8% -42 -1 -192 59.6% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.54
23 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.42 2003 1861 147.4 +0.30 +3.40 1.107 51.9% -79 +62 — 61.8% +0.69 10–9 (53%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25
24 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) — +4.99 2004 1796 141.9 +1.00 +3.07 1.120 51.9% -29 +91 — 58.4% +0.57 5–11 (31%) 13–9 (59%) — +2.36
25 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07 2005 1634 125.2 -2.10 -2.21 0.864 47.7% -5 +164 — 47.3% -0.38 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.24
26 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) — +0.18 2006 1728 142.0 +1.67 +0.64 1.044 50.8% -60 +139 — 54.9% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.07
27 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) — +3.21 2007 1619 129.9 -2.88 -1.60 0.862 47.4% -39 +129 — 42.7% -0.40 4–7 (36%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.17
28 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) — +1.94 2008 1598 127.6 -1.27 -0.06 0.936 48.3% +14 +83 — 41.3% -0.74 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
29 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.84 2009 1596 122.7 -3.61 -1.01 0.853 47.3% +24 +30 — 39.2% -0.69 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.34
30 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.25 2010 1560 116.9 -1.58 -0.99 0.890 48.3% — +26 — 37.9% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.24
31 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.19 2011 1552 98.9 +0.13 -1.79 0.856 47.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
32 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.50 2012 1538 97.7 -0.61 -1.01 0.391 35.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.11
33 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) — +0.92 2013 1526 102.0 -1.57 -1.93 0.843 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
34 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37 — 1900 139.2 -0.42 +0.39 0.979 49.7% -29 +74 -113 51.3% +0.03 64–73 (47%) 97–84 (54%) 99.2 +1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.