H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gilles Simon vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-1
Gilles Simon and Paolo Lorenzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2016 US Open second round 3-6 6-2 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 3-6 6-2 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(3) | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-3 6-2 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilles Simon | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |