H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 5-4

Gilles Simon holds a 5–4 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Gilles Simon leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2019 Rome Masters second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #56 6-2 3-6 6-3 Gilles Simon #28 Match data
Jul 28, 2017* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #58 6-3 3-6 6-2 Gilles Simon #39 Match data
Oct 6, 2016* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Gilles Simon #30 7-5 4-6 6-0 Philipp Kohlschreiber #31 Match data
Jul 18, 2014* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #26 7-5 6-3 Gilles Simon #38 Match data
Sep 25, 2010* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Gilles Simon #41 6-3 6-2 Philipp Kohlschreiber #31 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gilles Simon #42 4-6 6-3 1-6 6-1 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #31 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Gilles Simon #8 7-5 7-6(1) Philipp Kohlschreiber #38 Match data
Mar 1, 2007* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Gilles Simon #42 6-4 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #57 Match data
Feb 22, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #58 6-3 3-1 Gilles Simon #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7