H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 4-2

Gilles Simon holds a 4–2 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gilles Simon leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2016 Marseille round of 32 3-6 6-3 7-6(7).

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 2
6 main-draw meetings
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #44 3-6 6-3 7-6(7) Gilles Simon #15 Match data Feb 18, 2016* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Teymuraz Gabashvili #58 4-6 6-4 6-4 Gilles Simon #28 Match data Apr 15, 2014* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Gilles Simon #8 6-1 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #77 Match data Feb 27, 2009* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Gilles Simon #36 6-3 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #132 Match data Feb 23, 2008* QF ABN AMRO Open International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Gilles Simon #39 4-6 6-3 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #72 Match data Apr 12, 2007* R32 Valencia International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Gilles Simon #69 6-4 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #128 Match data Apr 19, 2006* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14
36 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Simon Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7%
35 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
37 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 866/882 of Gilles Simon's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Simon Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0% 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0% 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9% 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1% 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9% 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
33 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2% —/—
34 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0% —/—
35 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4% —/—
36 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9% —/—
37 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5% —/—
Career 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6% 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Simon Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.17 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 -0.04
20 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) 106.2 +0.22 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) -0.05
21 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) 108.4 -0.30 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 111.1 -1.35 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) 113.7 +0.42 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) 102.3 +4.99 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) 103.4 -0.07 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) 95.5 +0.18 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 95.5 +3.21 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 +0.59
28 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) 107.6 +1.94 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 +0.01
29 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) 98.9 +1.84 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) 100.8 +1.25 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 103.4 +1.19 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 94.8 -1.50 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 +0.47
33 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) 99.3 +0.92 2018 1511 99.9
34 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.2 +2.17
35 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.4 -1.39 2020 1498 102.1
36 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 90.0 -1.48 2021 1474 101.5
37 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) 109.4 -0.44
Career 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.