H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gilles Simon vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 4-0
Gilles Simon holds a 4–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gilles Simon leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2011 Bangkok fourth round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2011* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2011* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-0 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gilles Simon | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |