H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Goran Ivanisevic vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 6-2

Goran Ivanisevic holds a 6–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 5–1 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2000 Australian Open round of 128 6-4 2-6 7-5 1-6 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Goran Ivanisevic
CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Goran Ivanisevic #70 6-4 2-6 7-5 1-6 9-7 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Cedric Pioline #16 6-4 6-4 Goran Ivanisevic #21 Match data May 13, 1998* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Goran Ivanisevic #5 7-6(9) 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #27 Match data Feb 28, 1997* R16 Milan Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #9 6-4 7-6(4) Cedric Pioline #35 Match data Feb 22, 1996* R32 Antwerp Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #10 3-6 6-3 6-2 Cedric Pioline #62 Match data Feb 4, 1996* F Geneva Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #4 7-6(11) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #52 Match data Feb 17, 1995* R16 Milan ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Cedric Pioline #11 7-6(7) 6-0 Goran Ivanisevic #9 Match data Nov 13, 1993* QF Antwerp ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Goran Ivanisevic #4 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #38 Match data Nov 5, 1992* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,126 565 320 63.8% 1 2 1 7 11 22
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Goran Ivanisevic Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 1–4 20.0% #371 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,924 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,923 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1992 61–19 76.2% #4 2,091 0 6 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,977 0 11 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,888 0 12 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1996 76–25 75.2% #4 1,998 0 17 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,856 0 20 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,874 0 21 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2000 11–22 33.3% #129 1,593 0 21 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,810 1 22 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,695 1 22 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,643 1 22 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,630 1 22 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Goran Ivanisevic Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 11 8 19 57.9% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 14 9 23 60.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 6 31 80.6% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 12 8 20 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 20 6 26 76.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1996 30 10 40 75.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 34 8 42 81.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1997 21 11 32 65.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 21 4 25 84.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1998 18 14 32 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2000 9 15 24 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2002 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 197 142 339 58.1% 121 76 197 61.4% 70 27 97 72.2% 177 75 252 70.2% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 632/760 of Goran Ivanisevic's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Goran Ivanisevic Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 49/56 10.1 2.9 55.3% 79.8% 51.6% 63.4% 42.8% 67.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 59/80 13.6 3.6 55.4% 82.6% 53.0% 66.4% 43.0% 69.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 59/71 11.4 4.0 52.2% 81.9% 53.8% 61.1% 50.4% 68.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 76/88 13.7 4.4 55.2% 82.6% 51.5% 64.4% 37.3% 68.8% 37.0% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1995 54/63 14.5 4.0 52.5% 82.1% 52.2% 67.6% 47.1% 68.0% 36.6% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1996 82/101 14.7 4.3 55.2% 84.8% 52.8% 67.0% 46.9% 70.4% 36.5% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1997 61/71 15.2 5.7 54.0% 83.6% 51.4% 64.3% 42.5% 68.9% 34.6% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1998 61/72 14.9 6.2 54.2% 82.2% 47.7% 63.9% 42.1% 66.4% 35.1% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 1999 39/48 15.1 7.9 53.6% 80.2% 46.2% 57.3% 38.1% 64.7% 31.6% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2000 24/33 13.5 6.7 51.4% 80.8% 49.3% 67.1% 53.8% 65.3% 34.0% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2001 41/49 16.4 5.1 56.4% 81.1% 52.1% 67.0% 39.0% 68.5% 30.9% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2002 10/11 11.8 5.0 52.1% 77.5% 49.1% 54.4% 31.2% 63.7% 35.1% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 2003 3/3 3.7 4.3 50.5% 70.9% 30.0% 54.1% 88.9% 52.4% 29.8% 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 2004 14/14 13.6 6.9 57.6% 76.0% 47.3% 60.1% 29.6% 64.1% 26.6% 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 632/885 13.8 4.8 54.3% 82.0% 51.1% 64.3% 43.3% 68.0% 35.4% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Goran Ivanisevic Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1478 107.3 — — — — +58 — — 23.1% -1.31 0–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1692 142.2 — — — — -69 +43 — 51.7% +0.24 12–6 (67%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1925 154.6 — — — — -105 +24 -189 63.7% +0.84 11–8 (58%) 17–16 (52%) — -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 1924 149.4 +5.80 -0.90 1.118 51.4% -1 -71 -149 62.3% +0.60 6–7 (46%) 16–13 (55%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 2092 163.5 +7.53 +0.27 1.208 52.7% +13 -188 -169 68.4% +0.87 8–8 (50%) 28–11 (72%) — -3.70 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1993 2032 156.9 +6.92 +0.15 1.201 52.7% +10 -79 -143 66.9% +0.83 9–5 (64%) 24–13 (65%) — -1.46 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10
22 1994 1977 162.0 +7.19 +0.07 1.185 52.6% -3 +32 +51 64.9% +0.86 17–7 (71%) 25–18 (58%) — -2.60 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32
23 1995 1888 155.4 +5.62 -0.88 1.146 52.4% -15 +111 +129 64.3% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.19 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91
24 1996 1998 162.3 +7.95 -0.46 1.236 53.2% +40 -83 +56 69.8% +1.01 17–6 (74%) 34–19 (64%) — -1.18 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16
25 1997 1856 144.9 +5.72 -1.92 1.113 51.8% +37 +37 +144 63.5% +0.79 19–5 (79%) 25–20 (56%) — +1.07 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27
26 1998 1874 155.0 +3.70 -1.02 1.043 50.9% -6 -59 +206 60.3% +0.51 10–13 (43%) 30–23 (57%) — -0.71 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16
27 1999 1714 132.1 +2.12 -4.73 0.894 48.4% +11 -33 +317 46.9% -0.26 12–10 (55%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.73 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10
28 2000 1594 130.7 +2.10 -1.93 0.980 49.9% +26 +10 +418 39.5% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.16 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00
29 2001 1810 144.7 +5.34 -4.11 0.982 50.0% -79 — +306 54.8% +0.19 9–6 (60%) 14–13 (52%) — -1.32 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97
30 2002 1695 115.5 +0.35 -1.60 0.969 49.1% -55 — — 44.0% -0.20 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.87 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23
31 2003 1644 102.4 -2.78 -2.11 0.625 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.12 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89
32 2004 1631 117.1 +1.50 -5.51 0.740 46.2% -17 -111 +403 37.8% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.66 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76
Career — 2126 157.5 +5.67 -1.23 1.105 51.6% -4 -18 +101 60.7% +0.55 151–107 (59%) 261–191 (58%) 106.2 -1.18 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.