H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Goran Ivanisevic vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 6-2

Goran Ivanisevic holds a 6–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 5–1 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-4 2-6 7-5 1-6 9-7.

CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #70 6-4 2-6 7-5 1-6 9-7 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
May 13, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #16 6-4 6-4 Goran Ivanisevic #21 Match data
Feb 28, 1997* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #5 7-6(9) 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #27 Match data
Feb 22, 1996* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #9 6-4 7-6(4) Cedric Pioline #35 Match data
Feb 4, 1996* Zagreb ATP 250 F Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #10 3-6 6-3 6-2 Cedric Pioline #62 Match data
Feb 17, 1995* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #4 7-6(11) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #52 Match data
Nov 13, 1993* Antwerp ATP 250 QF Carpet Cedric Pioline #11 7-6(7) 6-0 Goran Ivanisevic #9 Match data
Nov 5, 1992* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #4 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,124 561 316 64.0% 1 2 1 0 18 22
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Goran Ivanisevic Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #371 1,488 0 0
17 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0
18 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,921 0 1
19 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,922 0 2
20 1992 57–18 76.0% #4 2,090 0 6 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,976 0 11 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,911 0 12 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 76–24 76.0% #4 2,001 0 17 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,866 0 20 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,873 0 21 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 11–21 34.4% #129 1,596 0 21 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,814 1 22 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,698 1 22 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,646 1 22 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,632 1 22 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5