H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 2-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Nottingham fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2002* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-3 6-2 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-4 6-4 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |