H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Albert Montanes H2H: 1-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Indianapolis round of 64 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #41 7-6(5) 6-4 Albert Montanes #58 Match data Aug 14, 2002* R64 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Albert Montanes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 529/544 of Albert Montanes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Albert Montanes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4%
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Albert Montanes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.51
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) — +0.28
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.10
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.26
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.48
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.20
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.96
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.51
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) — +1.21
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) — +1.82
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +2.46
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.40
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.62
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.54
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.24
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.03
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) 106.4 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.