H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Greg Rusedski vs Byron Black H2H: 4-0
Greg Rusedski holds a 4–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-1 6-3 6-4 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2001* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-1 7-6(3) | Byron Black | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-1 7-6(4) | Byron Black | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Greg Rusedski | 6-2 6-2 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greg Rusedski | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |