H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Byron Black H2H: 4-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-3 6-4.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Greg Rusedski #40 6-1 6-3 6-4 Byron Black #76 Match data
Jan 12, 2001* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #73 6-1 7-6(3) Byron Black #35 Match data
Mar 23, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #18 6-1 7-6(4) Byron Black #54 Match data
Oct 12, 1996* Beijing ATP 250 SF Carpet Greg Rusedski #75 6-2 6-2 Byron Black #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Byron Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2