H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 3-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 3–0 lead over Daniel Nestor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Stockholm Open quarterfinal 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Daniel Nestor
CAN Age 53 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #11 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 Daniel Nestor #115 Match data Nov 14, 1998* QF Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #39 6-3 6-3 Daniel Nestor #109 Match data Feb 14, 1997* R16 San Jose World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #65 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-2 Daniel Nestor #136 Match data Jun 26, 1996* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Daniel Nestor #1,106 #58 752 1,735 71 103 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Nestor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #823 1,482 0 0
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #242 1,481 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 1–3 25.0% #238 1,468 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1993 2–5 28.6% #189 1,485 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 5–5 50.0% #171 1,532 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1995 3–5 37.5% #177 1,573 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1996 11–13 45.8% #112 1,633 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 9–17 34.6% #107 1,589 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1998 11–17 39.3% #106 1,595 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1999 18–16 52.9% #86 1,672 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2000 6–9 40.0% #220 1,624 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2001 3–6 33.3% #219 1,662 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2002 0–1 0.0% #659 1,631 0 0
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2003 1–1 50.0% #500 1,630 0 0
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2004 0–1 0.0% #1062 1,619 0 0
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #1115 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Nestor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1996 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 46 66 112 41.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 5 7 12 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 153/173 of Daniel Nestor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Nestor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% 1991 3/3 3.7 3.0 57.1% 61.5% 59.5% 64.4% 68.8% 60.9% 32.6%
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1992 4/4 7.0 2.3 65.8% 72.2% 42.8% 63.8% 40.0% 62.2% 30.6%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1993 7/7 10.6 6.3 61.0% 79.0% 45.2% 70.1% 30.0% 65.9% 32.8%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1994 9/10 5.7 6.1 56.2% 72.8% 45.6% 55.8% 46.2% 60.6% 34.3%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1995 7/8 10.7 8.0 57.9% 75.7% 44.0% 66.7% 59.7% 62.5% 32.7%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1996 20/24 7.2 6.4 56.4% 76.5% 48.6% 61.6% 37.7% 64.2% 31.3%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1997 22/26 9.5 5.6 59.4% 73.8% 47.3% 53.7% 47.4% 63.0% 34.4%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1998 25/28 8.4 5.8 57.7% 75.2% 47.2% 62.9% 31.9% 63.2% 33.7%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1999 32/34 8.5 6.3 59.9% 77.4% 47.5% 64.9% 39.8% 65.3% 34.9%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2000 10/15 8.2 5.0 65.0% 72.4% 50.9% 61.7% 24.9% 65.0% 31.9%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2001 9/9 6.4 3.1 64.1% 69.9% 53.8% 41.1% 40.3% 63.4% 36.7%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2002 1/1 5.0 9.0 54.9% 73.3% 48.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.2% 31.2%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2003 2/2 13.5 8.0 52.4% 77.1% 52.8% 75.8% 20.0% 65.5% 31.1%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2004 1/1 5.0 2.0 64.2% 70.6% 42.1% 40.0% 12.5% 60.4% 31.8%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 8.0 5.0 47.5% 71.1% 47.6% 57.1% 100.0% 58.8% 25.5%
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 153/174 8.2 5.7 59.3% 74.8% 47.9% 60.5% 39.7% 63.7% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Nestor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1483 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.26
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 1991 1481 100.8 -3.36 0.00 0.834 46.8% +33 — — 33.3% -1.00 — — — +0.23
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 1992 1468 104.3 +0.24 -3.16 0.811 46.5% +51 — — 30.0% -1.50 0–1 0–1 — +0.34
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1993 1486 127.0 +3.20 -0.94 0.962 49.6% +34 — — 35.3% -0.35 0–2 1–5 (17%) — -0.14
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1994 1533 116.3 -0.41 -1.94 0.870 47.9% -12 — +53 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1995 1573 125.5 +0.35 -1.48 0.872 48.9% -1 — — 42.3% -0.15 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.18
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1996 1634 117.0 +2.02 -3.65 0.874 47.9% -46 — +26 43.6% -0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.68
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1997 1590 127.3 -0.03 -1.44 0.929 48.7% +19 — +20 35.4% -0.52 4–3 (57%) 2–13 (13%) — 0.00
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1998 1596 128.8 +0.61 -2.43 0.915 48.5% +30 — -28 45.8% -0.24 3–7 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.60
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1999 1672 138.5 +2.44 -2.00 1.004 50.2% +4 — -25 52.7% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.06
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 2000 1624 116.5 +0.44 -2.14 0.912 48.4% +38 — -28 47.5% -0.47 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.69
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2001 1663 113.6 +0.51 -1.30 1.002 49.9% -24 — -48 40.9% -0.32 — 0–2 — -0.23
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2002 1632 105.1 -0.84 -1.17 0.824 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.26
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2003 1631 111.5 +1.46 +1.37 0.901 49.2% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.04
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2004 1619 103.0 -0.89 +2.13 0.803 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1614 105.0 +0.88 +1.89 0.617 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.13
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1736 132.4 +1.02 -1.99 0.923 48.8% +8 — -4 43.3% -0.29 20–29 (41%) 33–54 (38%) 90.8 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.