H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 4-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Long Island quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 1998* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-2 6-3 Daniel Vacek #44 Match data
Sep 3, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #20 7-6(2) 6-2 6-2 Daniel Vacek #83 Match data
Aug 10, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #58 6-4 2-6 6-4 Daniel Vacek #45 Match data
Mar 31, 1994* Osaka ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #55 5-7 6-3 6-2 Daniel Vacek #54 Match data
Apr 22, 1993* Seoul ATP 250 R32 Hard Daniel Vacek #105 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,818 170 219 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,560 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,711 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,794 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1996 22–28 44.0% #71 1,694 0 0
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,672 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,744 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,630 0 0
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,578 0 0
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 — — — — — — —