H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 4-1

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1998 Long Island quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #6 6-2 6-3 Daniel Vacek #44 Match data Aug 29, 1998* QF Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #20 7-6(2) 6-2 6-2 Daniel Vacek #83 Match data Sep 3, 1997* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Greg Rusedski #58 6-4 2-6 6-4 Daniel Vacek #45 Match data Aug 10, 1994* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #55 5-7 6-3 6-2 Daniel Vacek #54 Match data Mar 31, 1994* R32 Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Daniel Vacek #105 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Greg Rusedski #151 Match data Apr 22, 1993* R32 Seoul ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Vacek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Vacek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Daniel Vacek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.