H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 2-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 2–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #165 7-5 4-6 6-2 6-2 Davide Sanguinetti #112 Match data Jun 23, 2004* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Greg Rusedski #13 6-2 7-6(7) 6-2 Davide Sanguinetti #86 Match data May 30, 1999* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,772 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,638 0 0
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,530 0 0
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,621 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,591 0 2
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,709 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Davide Sanguinetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 17 16 33 51.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2002 15 10 25 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% — 78 100 178 43.8% 45 83 128 35.2% 20 27 47 42.6% 14 23 37 37.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 355/390 of Davide Sanguinetti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1994 2/2 5.0 4.0 40.8% 71.3% 40.4% 63.5% 27.5% 52.8% 41.3%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1995 3/3 5.3 1.7 59.9% 74.9% 43.9% 41.3% 5.6% 62.5% 28.3%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1997 14/16 5.7 2.4 52.5% 68.6% 45.1% 59.9% 43.6% 57.4% 40.5%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1998 45/56 5.8 2.8 54.2% 72.2% 46.6% 55.4% 42.9% 60.0% 39.8%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1999 26/31 4.2 2.5 53.3% 66.6% 46.0% 55.1% 42.2% 56.9% 36.9%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 2000 32/38 7.4 2.7 53.2% 73.9% 47.0% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 38.8%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2001 34/37 6.0 3.5 56.1% 69.8% 46.0% 53.6% 39.3% 59.2% 35.5%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2002 36/43 6.4 2.6 57.2% 68.2% 48.3% 53.9% 47.0% 59.7% 37.3%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2003 36/37 4.5 2.4 58.7% 69.4% 48.3% 59.5% 39.6% 60.5% 36.2%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2004 31/31 4.1 2.5 59.6% 66.5% 49.2% 52.1% 37.9% 59.5% 36.1%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2005 50/50 5.4 1.6 57.2% 70.8% 49.8% 55.9% 39.5% 61.9% 37.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 33/33 4.9 2.2 57.1% 68.7% 49.6% 54.9% 31.7% 60.6% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 5.3 2.2 59.4% 67.1% 44.4% 58.0% 39.6% 58.0% 35.1%
Career — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% — 355/390 5.5 2.5 56.2% 69.7% 47.6% 55.6% 40.1% 59.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) — -0.02 1994 1483 107.3 -0.36 +1.47 0.876 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.11
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) — -1.78 1995 1455 106.3 -0.79 -2.82 0.755 45.0% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.04
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) — -3.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) — -1.21 1997 1498 126.0 -1.52 +0.15 0.950 48.9% — +63 — 42.5% -0.65 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.38
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) — -0.97 1998 1676 129.3 -1.67 +1.12 0.996 49.8% -85 -33 +42 51.4% +0.12 7–10 (41%) 8–11 (42%) — +3.09
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.02 1999 1560 123.1 -3.03 -1.02 0.856 47.3% +21 +5 — 36.1% -0.95 2–10 (17%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.62
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) — -1.81 2000 1639 131.0 -0.65 +1.27 0.998 49.8% +4 -99 +25 45.2% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.27
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) — -2.14 2001 1530 122.7 -2.53 -2.07 0.871 47.6% -6 -17 +99 34.0% -0.91 5–9 (36%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.78
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.36 2002 1621 139.4 -1.91 +0.49 0.924 48.7% +54 -99 -32 50.0% -0.05 12–7 (63%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.85
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) — -0.15 2003 1621 125.3 -1.40 -0.39 0.915 48.5% +60 -134 -67 42.2% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.67
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) — -1.02 2004 1591 122.1 -2.81 -0.69 0.891 48.0% +49 -138 -34 41.3% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.44
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.33 2005 1710 134.9 -0.38 -0.85 0.974 49.5% -28 -90 -81 48.5% -0.04 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1548 123.8 -1.74 -1.80 0.880 47.7% +25 +2 +57 34.5% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 110.9 -3.01 -0.31 0.835 46.7% +46 — — 42.9% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1510 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1493 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 — 1773 132.7 -1.71 -0.37 0.924 48.5% +16 -39 +4 43.2% -0.42 63–75 (46%) 72–95 (43%) 97.4 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.