H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 2-2

Greg Rusedski and Francisco Clavet are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Milan third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2002* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #30 7-5 6-3 Francisco Clavet #59 Match data
Jan 13, 2001* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard Francisco Clavet #47 6-3 6-2 Greg Rusedski #73 Match data
Feb 12, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Francisco Clavet #29 3-6 7-5 6-2 Greg Rusedski #10 Match data
Aug 17, 1998 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #7 6-1 7-6(6) Francisco Clavet #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8