H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 2-2

Greg Rusedski and Francisco Clavet are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2002 Milan round of 32 7-5 6-3.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #30 7-5 6-3 Francisco Clavet #59 Match data Jan 31, 2002* R32 Milan ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Francisco Clavet #47 6-3 6-2 Greg Rusedski #73 Match data Jan 13, 2001* SF ASB Classic ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Francisco Clavet #29 3-6 7-5 6-2 Greg Rusedski #10 Match data Feb 12, 1999* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #7 6-1 7-6(6) Francisco Clavet #27 Match data Aug 21, 1998* R16 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Francisco Clavet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 5 6 11 45.5%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Francisco Clavet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% —/—
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% —/—
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% —/—
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% —/—
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1%
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4%
33 —/— 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0%
34 —/— 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8%
Career 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Francisco Clavet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 +0.33
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) +0.39 1988 1459 97.0 +62 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 +0.84
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) -1.22 1989 1503 119.2 +47 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) +0.79
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) -0.02 1990 1576 125.5 -79 +53 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) +0.01
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) -1.78 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) +1.58
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) -3.68 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) -1.12
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) -1.21 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) -0.19
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) -0.97 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% +77 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) -0.48
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) -3.02 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) +0.51
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) -1.81 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) -1.96
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) -2.14 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) -1.22
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) -1.36 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) +2.29
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) -0.15 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) -2.18
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) -1.02 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) -2.35
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) -1.33 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) +0.10
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) -0.77
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 30.8% -1.77 0–2 +0.23
Career 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.