H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-1

Greg Rusedski and Jurgen Melzer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2004 St. Poelten third round 6-2 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 20, 2004* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #55 6-2 7-6(1) Greg Rusedski #105 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Greg Rusedski #39 6-1 6-4 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5