H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 5-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 5–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2005 Indianapolis round of 16 7-6(3) 6-2.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #40 7-6(3) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #55 Match data Jul 22, 2005* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #166 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data Jul 9, 2004* R16 Newport International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Greg Rusedski #9 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data Aug 26, 1999* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #72 7-6(4) 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #57 Match data Aug 7, 1996* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Greg Rusedski #82 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data Apr 29, 1995* SF Seoul ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 241 275 46.7% 0 0 0 2 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 10–8 55.6% #69 1,582 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,574 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,692 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5 1996 19–23 45.2% #73 1,635 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,655 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,622 0 1
26 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,658 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,678 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,594 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,573 0 3
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,597 0 3
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,481 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Greg Rusedski Kenneth Carlsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1992 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
21 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 1996 11 13 24 45.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8% 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
26 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 12 13 25 48.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2002 11 9 20 55.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 13 14 27 48.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0% 154 156 310 49.7% 10 34 44 22.7% 31 37 68 45.6% 46 48 94 48.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's and 448/516 of Kenneth Carlsen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Greg Rusedski Kenneth Carlsen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6% —/—
19 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3% 1992 13/18 8.4 1.8 58.2% 77.8% 54.9% 67.5% 38.7% 68.2% 33.3%
20 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0% 1993 41/44 6.8 2.9 55.0% 75.7% 49.6% 51.7% 33.0% 64.2% 34.6%
21 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9% 1994 36/41 7.2 2.8 57.5% 75.3% 52.1% 65.5% 43.1% 65.2% 34.3%
22 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8% 1995 42/47 8.8 3.9 57.6% 76.1% 50.6% 65.4% 46.2% 65.2% 34.3%
23 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2% 1996 32/42 7.9 4.1 58.6% 75.2% 50.8% 66.3% 30.0% 64.9% 34.9%
24 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3% 1997 39/50 9.0 3.7 56.3% 75.3% 50.4% 65.7% 42.1% 64.4% 35.5%
25 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5% 1998 32/45 9.4 4.5 54.5% 76.8% 48.7% 66.6% 42.3% 64.1% 34.5%
26 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5% 1999 33/38 5.9 3.5 59.1% 74.4% 50.3% 58.0% 41.7% 64.6% 37.1%
27 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4% —/—
28 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3% 2001 13/16 8.9 6.2 55.5% 73.0% 48.1% 62.6% 38.0% 61.9% 37.2%
29 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7% 2002 25/30 9.7 2.8 59.8% 75.3% 53.2% 75.9% 31.5% 66.6% 34.2%
30 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2% 2003 34/35 8.3 2.9 58.2% 73.2% 50.2% 51.3% 34.2% 63.3% 34.5%
31 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6% 2004 34/34 7.5 3.1 60.6% 73.0% 49.3% 48.2% 38.9% 63.6% 33.4%
32 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1% 2005 41/42 6.1 2.7 60.3% 71.4% 47.6% 63.1% 31.3% 61.7% 31.7%
33 —/— 2006 32/33 7.1 2.1 61.4% 72.6% 50.2% 58.8% 39.9% 64.0% 34.4%
34 —/— 2007 1/1 13.0 1.0 76.3% 80.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 72.9% 21.2%
Career 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6% 448/516 7.8 3.3 58.1% 74.6% 50.2% 61.1% 38.0% 64.3% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Greg Rusedski Kenneth Carlsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 +0.33
19 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) +0.39 1992 1583 123.7 +3.17 -2.70 1.049 50.9% +31 52.4% +0.38 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) +1.52
20 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) -1.22 1993 1575 137.7 +2.19 -2.94 0.967 49.0% +16 -19 +24 41.8% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 4–9 (31%) -0.66
21 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) -0.02 1994 1626 135.7 +2.62 -2.80 0.985 49.7% -7 -82 +48 48.0% +0.05 6–3 (67%) 6–12 (33%) +0.62
22 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) -1.78 1995 1692 137.1 +2.15 -2.47 0.985 50.1% +25 -113 -61 50.0% +0.01 8–7 (53%) 13–12 (52%) -0.47
23 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) -3.68 1996 1635 128.4 +2.08 -2.12 0.993 49.7% +14 -66 -25 47.7% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 11–9 (55%) +1.61
24 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) -1.21 1997 1656 129.2 +2.54 -2.10 0.998 50.1% +36 -138 -67 50.0% -0.02 9–12 (43%) 16–15 (52%) +1.85
25 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) -0.97 1998 1622 133.7 +1.62 -2.28 0.960 49.4% +55 -75 49.6% +0.09 9–11 (45%) 8–11 (42%) +2.63
26 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) -3.02 1999 1658 136.2 +1.26 +0.13 1.048 50.7% +21 -163 -30 51.6% +0.05 5–7 (42%) 9–6 (60%) +1.32
27 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) -1.81
28 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) -2.14 2001 1679 118.7 +0.30 -0.45 0.975 49.8% -2 -48 60.5% +0.53 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) +0.81
29 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) -1.36 2002 1743 133.7 +3.42 -2.03 1.023 50.3% 0 -100 51.4% +0.04 6–5 (55%) 14–9 (61%) -0.90
30 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) -0.15 2003 1594 113.9 +0.36 -2.67 0.941 48.7% +43 -159 -14 41.9% -0.54 7–9 (44%) 11–6 (65%) +2.57
31 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) -1.02 2004 1650 124.0 +0.26 -2.15 0.919 48.5% +14 -237 -5 40.7% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 11–7 (61%) -0.08
32 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) -1.33 2005 1573 117.9 -1.06 -3.54 0.828 46.7% +32 -220 +37 38.1% -1.00 8–4 (67%) 15–12 (56%) +1.51
33 2006 1598 132.6 +0.39 -1.27 0.954 49.1% +53 41.8% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 6–8 (43%) -0.19
34 2007 1481 95.8 -0.84 -0.44 0.782 45.6% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.29
Career 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75 1754 134.8 +1.46 -2.20 0.965 49.4% +26 -127 -28 46.8% -0.17 88–83 (51%) 132–124 (52%) 104.2 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.