H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 5-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 5–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2005 Indianapolis fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 18, 2005 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #40 7-6(3) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #55 Match data
Jul 9, 2004* Newport ATP 250 R16 Grass Greg Rusedski #166 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data
Aug 26, 1999* Boston ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #9 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data
Aug 7, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #72 7-6(4) 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #57 Match data
Apr 29, 1995* Seoul ATP 250 SF Hard Greg Rusedski #82 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3