H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 4-0

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 6-4 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Greg Rusedski #13 6-4 4-6 6-2 6-3 Richard Fromberg #74 Match data
Sep 12, 1997* Bournemouth ATP 250 R16 Clay Greg Rusedski #11 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Richard Fromberg #89 Match data
Feb 15, 1996* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #41 6-1 6-3 Richard Fromberg #120 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Greg Rusedski #57 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Richard Fromberg #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 282 46.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Richard Fromberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,662 0 2
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1992 14–22 38.9% #83 1,638 0 3
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,680 0 3
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,695 0 3
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,673 0 3
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,671 0 4
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,598 0 4
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,633 0 4
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4