H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Greg Rusedski vs Todd Martin H2H: 2-7

Todd Martin holds a 7–2 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 5–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Canada Masters second round 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5.

GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Todd Martin #47 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Greg Rusedski #39 Match data
Mar 1, 2002* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Todd Martin #70 6-4 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #31 Match data
Oct 31, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #6 4-6 7-6(10) 6-4 Todd Martin #4 Match data
Sep 8, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Todd Martin #7 5-7 0-6 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #8 Match data
Oct 11, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #4 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 Todd Martin #51 Match data
Jan 13, 1996* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Todd Martin #17 7-5 7-6(2) Greg Rusedski #38 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Todd Martin #16 6-7(8) 7-5 6-4 Greg Rusedski #84 Match data
Jun 10, 1994* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Todd Martin #9 4-6 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #50 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 SF Carpet Todd Martin #16 7-6(5) 6-3 Greg Rusedski #130 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Greg Rusedski Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8