H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Grega Zemlja vs Frank Dancevic

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Grega Zemlja vs Frank Dancevic.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grega Zemlja
SLO Age 39 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #131 6-0 6-2 Grega Zemlja #197 Match data Jan 12, 2009 Q1 Q Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grega Zemlja #1,144 #43 925 1,816 28 36 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grega Zemlja Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 2009 0–2 0.0% #174 1,500 0 0 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2010 3–4 42.9% #142 1,616 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2011 1–3 25.0% #116 1,588 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2012 10–7 58.8% #55 1,775 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2013 13–19 40.6% #121 1,719 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2016 1–1 50.0% #155 1,609 0 0 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grega Zemlja Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2012 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 4 11 15 26.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 15 21 36 41.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 64/64 of Grega Zemlja's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Grega Zemlja Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 2009 2/2 3.5 4.5 58.5% 63.6% 45.5% 46.4% 16.7% 55.8% 28.6% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2010 7/7 9.4 2.1 60.8% 70.9% 58.6% 57.5% 41.3% 66.1% 31.9% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2011 4/4 6.0 3.0 64.4% 65.9% 53.3% 51.8% 22.8% 61.2% 33.1% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2012 17/17 7.8 2.5 59.3% 70.3% 49.0% 58.1% 43.2% 61.5% 36.4% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2013 32/32 7.3 3.6 57.1% 71.0% 44.9% 58.7% 35.4% 60.0% 35.0% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2016 2/2 2.5 1.5 50.0% 68.1% 49.8% 68.8% 34.8% 58.8% 43.6% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 64/64 7.3 3.1 58.4% 70.1% 48.2% 57.9% 36.7% 61.0% 35.0% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grega Zemlja Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 2006 1482 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 2007 1469 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 2008 1476 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2009 1501 100.5 -1.00 -2.32 0.647 42.1% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — -0.10 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2010 1616 121.4 +1.79 -0.54 0.940 49.9% -5 — — 40.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2011 1589 113.3 -0.21 -2.04 0.852 47.2% — — — 40.0% -1.07 0–1 1–1 — -0.10 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2012 1776 133.5 -0.62 +0.21 0.945 49.0% +24 — -150 53.2% -0.06 4–1 (80%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.56 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2013 1720 137.2 -1.50 -1.44 0.877 47.7% -39 -96 -13 44.0% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.83 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2014 1683 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2015 1668 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2016 1610 108.2 -1.22 -0.54 1.058 51.3% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.33 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2017 1570 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1817 124.8 -0.80 -0.94 0.897 48.2% -8 -96 -54 44.6% -0.49 10–8 (56%) 19–12 (61%) 108.4 -1.98 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.