H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Grega Zemlja vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-0

Grega Zemlja holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grega Zemlja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grega Zemlja won the 2012 Vienna Open second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grega Zemlja
SLO Age 39 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grega Zemlja #70 7-5 6-4 Matthew Ebden #120 Match data Oct 19, 2012* R16 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Matthew Ebden #196 5-7 7-6(1) 6-4 Grega Zemlja #142 Match data Jan 2, 2011 Q2 Q Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grega Zemlja #1,144 #43 925 1,816 28 36 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grega Zemlja Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2009 0–2 0.0% #174 1,500 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2010 3–4 42.9% #142 1,616 0 0 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2011 1–3 25.0% #116 1,588 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2012 10–7 58.8% #55 1,775 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2013 13–19 40.6% #121 1,719 0 0 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 2016 1–1 50.0% #155 1,609 0 0 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grega Zemlja Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2012 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2013 4 11 15 26.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 15 21 36 41.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Grega Zemlja Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2009 2/2 3.5 4.5 58.5% 63.6% 45.5% 46.4% 16.7% 55.8% 28.6% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2010 7/7 9.4 2.1 60.8% 70.9% 58.6% 57.5% 41.3% 66.1% 31.9% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2011 4/4 6.0 3.0 64.4% 65.9% 53.3% 51.8% 22.8% 61.2% 33.1% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2012 17/17 7.8 2.5 59.3% 70.3% 49.0% 58.1% 43.2% 61.5% 36.4% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2013 32/32 7.3 3.6 57.1% 71.0% 44.9% 58.7% 35.4% 60.0% 35.0% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 2016 2/2 2.5 1.5 50.0% 68.1% 49.8% 68.8% 34.8% 58.8% 43.6% 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
Career — 64/64 7.3 3.1 58.4% 70.1% 48.2% 57.9% 36.7% 61.0% 35.0% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grega Zemlja Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1482 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1469 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1476 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1501 100.5 -1.00 -2.32 0.647 42.1% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — -0.10 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2010 1616 121.4 +1.79 -0.54 0.940 49.9% -5 — — 40.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2011 1589 113.3 -0.21 -2.04 0.852 47.2% — — — 40.0% -1.07 0–1 1–1 — -0.10 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2012 1776 133.5 -0.62 +0.21 0.945 49.0% +24 — -150 53.2% -0.06 4–1 (80%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.56 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2013 1720 137.2 -1.50 -1.44 0.877 47.7% -39 -96 -13 44.0% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.83 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2014 1683 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2015 1668 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2016 1610 108.2 -1.22 -0.54 1.058 51.3% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.33 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2017 1570 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 1817 124.8 -0.80 -0.94 0.897 48.2% -8 -96 -54 44.6% -0.49 10–8 (56%) 19–12 (61%) 108.4 -1.98 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.