H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Grega Zemlja vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-0
Grega Zemlja holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grega Zemlja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Grega Zemlja won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Santiago Giraldo | 6-1 6-4 | Grega Zemlja | Match data |
| May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Grega Zemlja | 6-1 6-4 6-1 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grega Zemlja | #1,144 | #43 | 925 | 1,816 | 27 | 35 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Grega Zemlja | Santiago Giraldo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #142 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |