H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Grigor Dimitrov vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 4-2

Grigor Dimitrov holds a 4–2 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Grigor Dimitrov leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Grigor Dimitrov won the 2021 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grigor Dimitrov
Bulgaria Age 35 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2021* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Grigor Dimitrov #17 7-6(3) 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #53 Match data
Mar 26, 2018* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #90 6-4 6-4 Grigor Dimitrov #4 Match data
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #47 4-6 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #55 Match data
Jan 9, 2015* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #11 3-6 6-4 7-6(8) Jeremy Chardy #31 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Grigor Dimitrov #78 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #82 Match data
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jeremy Chardy #61 6-2 6-4 6-4 Grigor Dimitrov #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Grigor Dimitrov #146 #3 5,150 2,176 476 310 60.6% 0 1 1 2 5 9
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grigor Dimitrov Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #493 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 2–6 25.0% #288 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 1–1 50.0% #106 1,494 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2011 18–25 41.9% #76 1,739 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2012 23–18 56.1% #48 1,846 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2013 35–23 60.3% #23 1,954 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2014 50–18 73.5% #11 2,095 0 4 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2015 32–22 59.3% #28 1,950 0 4 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2016 40–25 61.5% #17 2,018 0 4 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2017 49–19 72.1% #3 2,134 0 8 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2018 24–19 55.8% #19 1,933 0 8 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2019 23–21 52.3% #20 1,944 0 8 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2020 17–10 63.0% #19 1,957 0 8 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2021 24–18 57.1% #28 1,935 0 8 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2022 26–22 54.2% #28 1,864 0 8 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2023 41–21 66.1% #14 2,095 0 8 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2024 45–18 71.4% #10 2,008 0 9 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2025 18–12 60.0% #44 1,956 0 9 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2026 8–11 42.1% #146 1,810 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1