H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Guido Pella vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-1
Guido Pella and Horacio Zeballos are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2017 Munich quarterfinal 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2017* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Guido Pella | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(3) | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-3 6-4 | Guido Pella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guido Pella | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |