H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guido Pella vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 2-1
Guido Pella holds a 2–1 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Guido Pella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2015 Washington second round 6-3 6-7(7) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2015* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Guido Pella | 6-3 6-7(7) 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guido Pella | 4-6 6-4 6-3 2-6 12-10 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-1 6-2 | Guido Pella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guido Pella | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |