H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guido Pella vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 2-2
Guido Pella and Peter Gojowczyk are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Peter Gojowczyk leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guido Pella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2019 Antwerp third round 5-7 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Guido Pella | 5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2019* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2018* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Guido Pella | 6-4 6-4 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Guido Pella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guido Pella | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |