H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Guillaume Raoux vs D. Pate H2H: 0-1
D. Pate holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Pate leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, D. Pate won the 1990 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | D. Pate | 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| D. Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillaume Raoux | D. Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |