H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Byron Black H2H: 0-2
Byron Black holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1998 Nottingham fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1998* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Byron Black | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1998* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Byron Black | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |