H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Guillermo Canas vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-1
Guillermo Canas and Marcos Daniel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2009 Belgrade third round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2009* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcos Daniel | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2007* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-1 6-4 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Canas | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |