H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Guillermo Coria vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-2
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Coria in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-3 6-2 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2006* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 7-5 6-2 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2002* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Coria | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |