H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 4-0

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 4–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2013 Hamburg Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #85 6-3 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 Match data Jul 17, 2013* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #99 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #49 Match data Apr 11, 2013* R32 Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #37 6-3 1-6 7-6(1) 4-6 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 Match data Aug 31, 2011* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #39 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #96 Match data May 11, 2010* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.