H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 4-0

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 4–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2013 Hamburg second round 6-3 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 17, 2013* Hamburg ATP 500 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #85 6-3 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 Match data
Apr 11, 2013* Casablanca ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #99 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #49 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #37 6-3 1-6 7-6(1) 4-6 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 Match data
May 11, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #39 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5